Harsanyi’s theorem without the sure-thing principle: On the consistent aggregation of Monotonic Bernoullian and Archimedean preferences

نویسنده

  • Stéphane Zuber
چکیده

This paper studies the extension of Harsanyi’s theorem (Harsanyi, 1955) in a framework involving uncertainty. It seeks to extend the aggregation result to a wide class of Monotonic Bernoullian and Archimedean preferences (Cerreia-Vioglio et al., 2011) that subsumes many models of choice under uncertainty proposed in the literature. An impossibility result is obtained, unless we are in the specific framework where all individuals and the decision-maker are subjective expected utility maximizers sharing the same beliefs. This implies that non-expected utility preferences cannot be aggregated consistently.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Harsanyi’s theorem without the sure-thing principle

We study a version of Harsanyi’s theorem (Harsanyi, 1955) in a framework involving uncertainty. Without assuming the sure-thing principle but sticking to consequentialism, we obtain that a Paretian social aggregation should be affine and that all decision makers must use additively separable preferences that resembles expected utilities. Whenever preferences are state independent, we find that ...

متن کامل

Aggregation of Monotonic Bernoullian Archimedean preferences: Arrovian impossibility results

Cerreia-Vioglio, Ghirardato, Maccheroni, Marinacci and Siniscalchi (Economic Theory, 48:341–375, 2011) have recently proposed a very general axiomatisation of preferences in the presence of ambiguity, viz. Monotonic Bernoullian Archimedean (MBA) preference orderings. This paper investigates the problem of Arrovian aggregation of such preferences — and proves dictatorial impossibility results fo...

متن کامل

Harsanyi’s aggregation theorem with incomplete preferences

We provide a generalization of Harsanyi (1955)’s aggregation theorem to the case of incomplete preferences at the individual and social level. Individuals and society have possibly incomplete expected utility preferences that are represented by sets of expected utility functions. Under Pareto indifference, social preferences are represented through a set of aggregation rules that are utilitaria...

متن کامل

CARESS Working Paper 98-03 Trade Between Rational Agents as a Result of Asymmetric Information

\No Trade" Theorems claim that the mere arrival of new information can not induce trade between rational agents, even in the presence of asymmetric information. We analyze an economy in which the information agents receive is without noise. As long as preferences abide by the Sure Thing Principle, the no-trade result holds. However, under more general preferences, which do not satisfy the Sure ...

متن کامل

A Note on Dhillon ( 1998 ) ∗

We provide a counterexample to Theorem 1 (A) in Dhillon [3]. 1 Dhillon’s Multi-Profile Version of Harsanyi’s Theorem on Utilitarianism In an important paper, Amrita Dhillon [3] provided a multi-profile version of Harsanyi’s [5] single-profile theorem on utilitarianism. Like Harsanyi did, she assumed that the social alternatives are lotteries. Individuals’ preferences satisfy the von Neumann-Mor...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2017